Cutover vs Staged: The Best Migration Strategy

Choose the right migration approach for your organization's needs.

Last updated: 2025-01-15 Plan & Prepare

Migration Strategy Comparison

Cutover

All Users
Single Weekend
Complete

Staged

Batch 1
Batch 2
Batch 3
Weeks/Months
Complete

Overview

Choosing the right migration strategy is crucial for minimizing business disruption and ensuring a successful transition to your new platform. The two primary approaches—cutover and staged—each have distinct advantages depending on your organization's size, complexity, and requirements.

Key Decision Factor

Proper planning, regardless of approach, can reduce business risks, improve end-user satisfaction, and help your organization unlock the benefits of the cloud.

Cutover Migration

Definition

The entire company is switched at the same time, typically over a weekend. All users transition to the new system in a single coordinated event.

Advantages

  • • The fastest, simplest form of migration
  • • Immediate access to new system for all users
  • • Single-pass completion option available
  • • New emails arrive in target system right away
  • • No coexistence period to manage

Considerations

  • • Requires weekend availability
  • • Tight scheduling demands
  • • All users impacted at once if issues arise
  • • Requires thorough pre-migration testing

Pre-Staging Option

You can combine multiple migration passes before the final cutover. Historical data migrates in advance, and only remaining items transfer during a quick delta pass on cutover day, reducing the migration window significantly.

Staged Migration

Definition

Migrating user mailboxes in batches across weeks or months. Groups of users transition at different times, offering flexibility in scope and timing.

Advantages

  • • Multiple flexible approaches available
  • • Extended timeline reduces deadline pressure
  • • Minimal disruption to end-users
  • • Customizable batch schedules
  • • Selective content migration options
  • • Older emails can migrate post-cutover

Considerations

  • • More complicated than cutover migrations
  • • Requires thorough advance planning
  • • Ongoing coexistence management necessary
  • • Users on different systems temporarily
  • • May require additional coexistence tools

Side-by-Side Comparison

Factor Cutover Staged
Duration 1-3 days Weeks to months
Complexity Lower Higher
User Impact All at once Gradual
Best For Small-medium orgs Large enterprises
Coexistence Minimal Required
Planning Required Moderate Extensive

Recommendation

Choose Cutover When:

  • You have a smaller organization with manageable data volumes
  • Weekend availability for the migration is possible
  • You want the simplest, fastest approach
  • Coexistence complexity is a concern

Choose Staged When:

  • Handling large mailbox quantities or extensive data archives
  • Maintaining uptime during transitions is critical
  • Different departments have different migration schedules
  • You need flexibility in timing and approach

Was this article helpful?

We value your feedback

Help us improve your experience

What would you like to share with us?

Need direct support? Open a ticket